A Critical Reflection on the Black Experience in America
At this pivotal moment in history, it’s essential for African Americans to take a clear-eyed look at their collective journey. Despite generations of progress, the persistent struggle against systemic barriers has led to a deep sense of generational fatigue. Just as Black communities gain momentum in shaping American society, opposing forces work to reinforce racial hierarchies, aiming to limit the strides made toward true equity.
The deliberate efforts to erase Black history from educational curriculums and public discourse highlight the ongoing resistance to full inclusion. These actions, often driven by influential decision-makers, underscore a broader attempt to diminish Black contributions and suppress the rightful place of African Americans in the nation’s narrative. This erasure is not just about history—it is a calculated effort to obstruct access to the American dream and maintain structures of inequality.
A Document for a Limited Citizenry
When the U.S. Constitution was drafted in 1787, it was not designed to include African Americans as full members of the new republic. The founding document was constructed primarily to serve the interests of white, landowning men, many of whom were slaveholders. African Americans—whether enslaved or free—were not granted citizenship, voting rights, or legal protections under the original Constitution. Instead, their status was either ignored or explicitly restricted through provisions that reinforced their exclusion from political and social equality.
The Three-Fifths Compromise: Institutionalizing Disenfranchisement
One of the most glaring examples of African Americans’ exclusion from the Constitution is the Three-Fifths Compromise. This provision, found in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, determined that enslaved individuals would count as three-fifths of a person for purposes of taxation and representation in Congress. However, this did not grant enslaved people any rights or recognition as citizens; rather, it was a mechanism to increase the political power of Southern slave-holding states while maintaining their disenfranchisement. This compromise reflected the broader reality that African Americans were viewed as property rather than as members of the nation.
The Fugitive Slave Clause: Federal Protection of Slavery
Another constitutional provision that cemented African Americans’ exclusion was the Fugitive Slave Clause (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 3). This clause required that enslaved individuals who escaped to free states be returned to their owners, reinforcing the idea that slavery was a protected institution under federal law. It denied enslaved people any legal pathway to freedom through escape and ensured that even in free states, they had no constitutional protections.
No Path to Citizenship or Rights
At the time of its ratification, the Constitution provided no framework for African Americans—enslaved or free—to attain citizenship or legal rights. The Bill of Rights (1791), which established individual freedoms, applied only to free white men. The Supreme Court reaffirmed this exclusion in the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) decision, ruling that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could never be considered U.S. citizens and had no standing to sue in federal court. This ruling further illustrated how the legal system, based on the Constitution, upheld racial exclusion and systemic oppression.
Amendments and the Gradual Inclusion of African Americans
It was not until after the Civil War that the U.S. Constitution was amended to formally recognize African Americans as citizens. The 13th Amendment (1865) abolished slavery, the 14th Amendment (1868) granted citizenship and equal protection under the law, and the 15th Amendment (1870) prohibited racial discrimination in voting. However, these amendments did not immediately translate into full equality, as Jim Crow laws, voter suppression, and systemic racism continued to undermine African Americans’ rights for over a century.
While the U.S. Constitution has evolved to be more inclusive over time, its original framework was explicitly designed to exclude African Americans from the nation’s political and social fabric. It took generations of struggle, civil rights movements, and legal battles to begin dismantling the systemic inequalities embedded in the country’s founding document.
The Litmus Test
The Decentralized Ecosystems Intranet (DEI) Embargo serves as a pivotal test of unity among African Americans and people of color in the face of ongoing efforts to entrench economic and social disparities. As policies dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, a stark divide emerges—one that threatens to relegate marginalized communities to a permanent underclass while reinforcing an unprecedented concentration of wealth at the top, reminiscent of ancient empires.
Should the Decentralized Ecosystems Intranet gain momentum, it could lay the groundwork for broader movements aimed at economic equity. By strategically leveraging economic pressure, this initiative aspires to create opportunities for wealth transfer, enabling historically oppressed communities to establish and sustain generational legacies—an overdue shift toward true economic empowerment.
Support InnerKwest: Powering Truth & Excellence with Bitcoin
At InnerKwest.com, we are committed to delivering impactful journalism, deep insights, and fearless social commentary. Your Bitcoin contributions help us execute with excellence, ensuring we remain independent and continue to amplify voices that matter.
Support our mission—send BTC today!
🔗 Bitcoin Address: bc1qgdnd752esyl4jv6nhz3ypuzwa6wav9wuzaeg9g
Thank you for standing with us in pursuit of truth and progress!